MAKING A POSTER RUBRIC
|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Required Elements |
The poster includes all required elements as well as additional information. |
All required elements are included on the poster. |
All but 1 of the required elements are included on the poster. |
Several required elements were missing. |
|
Labels |
All items of importance on the poster are clearly labeled with labels that can be read from at least 3 ft. away. |
Almost all items of importance on the poster are clearly labeled with labels that can be read from at least 3 ft. away. |
Many items of importance on the poster are clearly labeled with labels that can be read from at least 3 ft. away. |
Labels are too small to view OR no important items were labeled. |
|
Graphics - Relevance |
All graphics are related to the topic and make it easier to understand. All borrowed graphics have a source citation. |
All graphics are related to the topic and most make it easier to understand. Some borrowed graphics have a source citation. |
All graphics relate to the topic. One or two borrowed graphics have a source citation. |
Graphics do not relate to the topic OR several borrowed graphics do not have a source citation. |
|
Attractiveness |
The poster is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness. |
The poster is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness. |
The poster is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy. |
The poster is distractingly messy or very poorly designed. It is not attractive. |
|
Grammar |
There are no grammatical/mechanical mistakes on the poster. |
There are 1-2 grammatical/mechanical mistakes on the poster. |
There are 3-4 grammatical/mechanical mistakes on the poster. |
There are more than 4 grammatical/mechanical mistakes on the poster. |
Presentation Rubric
|
|
Evaluating Student Presentations |
|
|
||
|
Developed by Information Technology Evaluation Services, NC Department of Public Instruction |
|
||||
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
|
Organization |
Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. |
Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around. |
Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. |
Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. |
|
|
Subject Knowledge |
Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject. |
Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions. |
Student is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate. |
Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration. |
|
|
Graphics |
Student uses superfluous graphics or no graphics |
Student occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation. |
Student's graphics relate to text and presentation. |
Student's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation. |
|
|
Mechanics |
Student's presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
|
|
Eye Contact |
Student reads all of report with no eye contact. |
Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report. |
Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. |
Student maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. |
|
|
Elocution |
Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear. |
Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. |
Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation. |
Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Points: |
|
Writing Rubric
|
Criteria |
Master |
Proficient |
Novice |
Amateur |
|
Writes small using seed ideas, not watermelon topics |
Writing focuses on a “seed idea” and includes many details, vivid description, and appropriate examples |
Writing focuses on a seed idea, and includes some details, good description and some examples |
Writing focuses on a seed idea, but ahs few details, little description and few examples. |
Writing is drawn from a watermelon topic with no details, no description and no examples |
|
Uses “mind” pictures to describe the events or people |
Writing uses vivid imagery and the five sense to make words alive |
Writing uses good imagery and some of the senses to make words alive |
Writing uses little imagery and just a few of the senses to make words alive. |
Writing does not use imagery or senses to make words alive. |
|
Writing uses delicious language |
Writes with powerful verbs, awesome adjectives, and a little rich language |
Writing includes some powerful verbs, some awesome adjectives and a little rich language |
Writes with very few powerful verbs, few awesome adjectives and poor use of language |
Writing does not include powerful verbs, awesome adjectives or rich language. |
|
Begins with a snappy lead |
The beginning of the piece draws your attention |
The beginning of the piece is good and makes you want to read more |
The beginning of the piece is fair and you are not sure you want to read more |
The beginning of the piece is not snappy and you do not want to read further |
|
Good organization; makes sense |
The writing flows very smoothly, is fluent, makes good sense and is very organized |
The writing flows very smoothly, is fluent, makes good sense and is very organized. |
The writing just flows, makes some sense and is somewhat organized |
The writing is choppy, doesn’t make sense and is not organized. |
![MCTR00270_0000[1]](http://www2.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/congress/caraginewq1_files/image054.gif)






